Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Mckernon <jmckernon@...>
Cc: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2013 - 6:17 am

--14dae934038d6ef9cb04d56cdb1e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No, it is not silly at all - it is logically very accurate. Having an image
that appeals
to a particular sexuality is the same as having an image that appeals to
asexuality,
which in itself is a type of sexuality.

But the point of this remark was to underline that you can get offended by
anything if you
choose to. Like, start comparing the wallpaper to the color of your skin
and get offended
by that.

--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:08 AM, James Mckernon wrote:

> I think that's a fairly silly comparison. Your example is essentially

--14dae934038d6ef9cb04d56cdb1e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, it is not silly at all - it is logically very accurate. Having an image=
that appealsto a particular sexuality is the same as having an image t=
hat appeals to asexuality,which in itself is a type of sexuality.
But the point of this remark was to underline that you can get offended=
by anything if youchoose to. Like, start comparing the wallpaper to th=
e color of your skin and get offendedby that.--
Louigi Veronahttp://www.louigiv=
erona.ru/

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:08 AM, James M=
ckernon <jmckernon@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's a fairly silly comparison. Your example is essentially
neutral: a wallpaper without sexual imagery doesn't cater in
particular to any group, at least not on gender/sexuality grounds. An
image with sexual imagery manifestly does cater more to one group than
others (albeit, in this case, probably only very slightly).

J

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@gmail.com> wrote:

y sends the
br>
;hot"
is

>

_____________________________
ser@lists.linuxaudio.org

--14dae934038d6ef9cb04d56cdb1e--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Feb 10, 6:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Bill Gribble, (Sun Feb 10, 7:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 8:42 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Simon Wise, (Mon Feb 11, 9:15 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 10, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Dan MacDonald, (Mon Feb 11, 7:56 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Johannes Kroll, (Tue Feb 12, 1:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louigi Verona, (Tue Feb 12, 1:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Feb 12, 2:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Johannes Kroll, (Tue Feb 12, 1:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis Gorenfeld, (Tue Feb 12, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Luke Peterson, (Sun Feb 10, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], SxDx, (Sun Feb 10, 8:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Dragan Noveski, (Mon Feb 11, 6:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Feb 11, 7:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Dragan Noveski, (Mon Feb 11, 7:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], hermann meyer, (Mon Feb 11, 5:17 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Al Thompson, (Sun Feb 10, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 10, 8:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 10, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louigi Verona, (Sun Feb 10, 8:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Feb 10, 9:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Al Thompson, (Mon Feb 11, 1:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Mckernon, (Sun Feb 10, 9:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 6:17 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Feb 10, 9:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis, (Sun Feb 10, 8:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louigi Verona, (Sun Feb 10, 8:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Al Thompson, (Sun Feb 10, 10:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] **** your sexism, Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAU] **** your sexism, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 9:01 am)
Re: [LAU] **** your sexism, Al Thompson, (Mon Feb 11, 6:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] **** your sexism, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 7:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Dave Phillips, (Sun Feb 10, 10:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Feb 10, 10:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Mckernon, (Sun Feb 10, 11:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 1:29 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Feb 10, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis Gorenfeld, (Sun Feb 10, 7:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Feb 10, 7:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis Gorenfeld, (Sun Feb 10, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Folderol, (Sun Feb 10, 8:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sun Feb 10, 7:37 pm)