Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2013 - 2:47 am

On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 01:40 +0000, James Harkins wrote:

The truth is similar, but it's much more complex. The solution regarding
to the teacher issue is to teach boys and girls in different classes, at
least for physics and similar subjects. The resume simply is that girls
and boys are different.

> - FalkTX may have had some good reasons to choose that image, but choosing it

What do you feel, if you take a look at the wallpaper? I felt nothing, I
just noticed that it's no wallpaper for my taste. Now I feel confused.
I'm a heterosexual man and wonder how many men feel something that has
to do with erotic or porn, when taking a look at the wallpaper. I
suspect most of us feel the same as I did, nothing.

> Sometimes there are good reasons to be insensitive, but

How should anybody be able to foresee, that this wallpaper could excite
people that much. In the past they used hammer and chisel to remove
stone from male statues. Today they castrate more insensitive, by trying
to take libre away, by calling something sexism that has absolutely
nothing to do with sexism.

> (Chinese web and chat apps have an emoticon of somebody

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Harkins, (Mon Feb 11, 1:41 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis, (Mon Feb 11, 3:17 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Harkins, (Mon Feb 11, 2:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis Gorenfeld, (Mon Feb 11, 5:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Simon Wise, (Mon Feb 11, 6:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 2:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Bruno Gola, (Mon Feb 11, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 3:57 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 10:18 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, David Baron, (Mon Feb 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 11:15 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Tue Feb 12, 10:44 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Florian Faber, (Mon Feb 11, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Florian Faber, (Mon Feb 11, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Tue Feb 12, 10:42 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Q, (Tue Feb 12, 12:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, david, (Mon Feb 11, 7:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 8:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Dave Phillips, (Mon Feb 11, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 11, 9:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 10:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, david, (Mon Feb 11, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Neil C Smith, (Mon Feb 11, 11:53 am)