linuxaudio.org

On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 06:45 -0800, Louis Gorenfeld wrote:

quoted text
> Haha, good thing you didn't see the Vocaloid booth at NAMM! Oh man.

>

> But I do agree it's unprofessional for a Linux distribution to default

> to that wallpaper (and are there copyright issues?).

I'm not sure if this really is OT, since for me it isn't. Linux audio is

about freedom and a harmless default wallpaper about something from a

creative commons music community inflame passions of some Linux users.

Why? It's free from porn, showing a virtual "school girl" singer.
And other wallpapers are more professional, just because this default

wallpaper does show a "school girl"?
Why should there be copy right issues? The idea of creative commons is

to avoid copyright issues.
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/35879
For me it's very strange that it's classified as porn.
It doesn't fit to my taste, there is some commercial background, but

it's about creative commons music and free from porn. Even the minimal

erotic is that harmless, that in Germany you're allowed to show this

picture in a kindergarten or elementary school. Most default wallpapers

I've seen are much more worse, completely without erotic, but instead of

that unskilled art, that I would protect children against those

unaesthetic wallpapers.
Regards,

Ralf
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user