Re: [LAU] [OT] mixing CC and GPL -- was [semi-OT] Licences and your opinion and experience

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2013 - 8:03 pm

Le 14/11/2013 20:21, Robin Gareus a écrit :

My point of view for a user (not a developer) who shares his artistic
production is to use the Free Art license which is recommended by the FSF.
One great advantage of this license is to take the 'Berne's Convention'
into account. I think this isn't the case for CC.

in English: http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en
also in German, Spanish, Portuguese or Polish.
my 2 cents.
Phil.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [semi-OT] Licences and your opinion and experience, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Nov 14, 12:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] mixing CC and GPL -- was [semi-OT] Licences a..., Phil Hézaine, (Thu Nov 14, 8:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] [semi-OT] Licences and your opinion and experience, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Nov 14, 7:04 pm)