Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, October 25, 2013 - 4:42 pm

--Apple-Mail-C41FFBB0-AED1-4B78-83FF-9AB9DB73DF0C
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks guys.

It seemed folks were having trouble running it with jack. That was my reason=
for asking. Seemingly it would work with alsa. I'm yet to build and try it b=
ut will soon.

Thanks!

~ Russell

On Oct 25, 2013, at 6:26 AM, Paul Davis wrote:

>=20

? Any clear path hints on how to do it in KxStudio appreciated (without expe=
ctation) too.
ia firewire devices. This is changing, but it is likely that on any given cu=
rrent distro, it is still the case that you would have to use JACK.=20
p to use JACK, with JACK already running and using your firewire device.

--Apple-Mail-C41FFBB0-AED1-4B78-83FF-9AB9DB73DF0C
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks guys.It seemed folks were having trouble running it with jack. That was my reason for asking. Seemingly it would work with alsa. I'm yet to build and try it but will soon.Thanks!~ RussellOn Oct 25, 2013, at 6:26 AM, Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan.osaudio@gmail.com> wrote:
Has anyone been able to get this cool looking rig up on a FireWire device? Any clear path hints on how to do it in KxStudio appreciated (without expectation) too.
Until very, very recently, JACK was the only way to do audio i/o on
Linux via firewire devices. This is changing, but it is likely that on
any given current distro, it is still the case that you would have to
use JACK. Ergo, using ISSE on such a system is no more
less than simply starting it up to use JACK, with JACK already running
and using your firewire device.

--Apple-Mail-C41FFBB0-AED1-4B78-83FF-9AB9DB73DF0C--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 8:52 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 11:38 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Dave Phillips, (Tue Oct 22, 1:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Thu Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 4:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Fri Oct 25, 8:33 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Oct 22, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Milan Lazecky, (Wed Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Oct 22, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 9:43 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:08 am)