Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan.osaudio@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, October 25, 2013 - 1:26 pm

--047d7b5d58a266afa004e990b333
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Russell Hanaghan <
hanaghan.osaudio@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone been able to get this cool looking rig up on a FireWire device?

Until very, very recently, JACK was the only way to do audio i/o on Linux
via firewire devices. This is changing, but it is likely that on any given
current distro, it is still the case that you would have to use JACK.

Ergo, using ISSE on such a system is no more less than simply starting it
up to use JACK, with JACK already running and using your firewire device.

--047d7b5d58a266afa004e990b333
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Russell Hanaghan <hanag=
han.osaudio@gmail.com
> wrote:
Has anyone been able to g=
et this cool looking rig up on a FireWire device? Any clear path hints on h=
ow to do it in KxStudio appreciated (without expectation) too.
Until very, very recently, JACK was the only way=
to do audio i/o on
Linux via firewire devices. This is changing, but it is likely that on=20
any given current distro, it is still the case that you would have to=20
use JACK. Ergo, using ISSE on such a system is no more=20
less than simply starting it up to use JACK, with JACK already running=20
and using your firewire device.

--047d7b5d58a266afa004e990b333--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 8:52 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 11:38 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Dave Phillips, (Tue Oct 22, 1:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Thu Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Paul Davis, (Fri Oct 25, 1:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 4:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Fri Oct 25, 8:33 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Oct 22, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Milan Lazecky, (Wed Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Oct 22, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 9:43 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:08 am)