Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Leigh Dyer <lsd@...>
Cc: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - 11:10 am

--047d7b86de824a135c04e95273e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Leigh Dyer wrote:

> On 22/10/13 7:52 PM, michael noble wrote:

Well it built, and the app itself runs, but it doesn't seem to recognize
any sound files, or at least, none of the file dialogues seem to let me
open a wave file even though they demand one... All I have time for at the
moment.

--047d7b86de824a135c04e95273e5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Leigh Dyer <<=
a href=3D"mailto:lsd@wootangent.net" target=3D"_blank">lsd@wootangent.net> wrote:
On 2=
2/10/13 7:52 PM, michael noble wrote:

Has anybody had a play with this? Looks, and more importantly, sounds
like it works well enough to do some useful, creative, and/or obnoxious
things.

http://isse.sour=
ceforge.net/

This looks really cool! Please let us know if you have any luck getting it =
to work -- I'd be curious to see what kind of creative editing uses thi=
s could be put to.

Thanks
Leigh=
Well it built, and the app itself runs, bu=
t it doesn't seem to recognize any sound files, or at least, none of th=
e file dialogues seem to let me open a wave file even though they demand on=
e... All I have time for at the moment.=A0

--047d7b86de824a135c04e95273e5--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 8:52 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 11:38 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Dave Phillips, (Tue Oct 22, 1:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Thu Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 4:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Fri Oct 25, 8:33 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Oct 22, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Milan Lazecky, (Wed Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Oct 22, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 9:43 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:08 am)