Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@...>
Cc: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - 9:43 am

--047d7b5dba7a21599c04e9513acc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Right, got it, you hate Adobe, invective noted. Maybe we can start another
thread and bitch about the stupidity of DRM in ebooks (something I
particular hate, having witnessed idiotic things like 400 page ebooks in
university libraries with 1 day lending periods and the inability to copy
text). Or maybe we can rail on about Adobe's sporadic on/off support of
Linux desktop users.

In the meantime, has anyone else actually tried the application? Building
it on AUR now and it seems to have JACK support.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 16:52 +0800, michael noble wrote:

--047d7b5dba7a21599c04e9513acc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Right, got it, you hate Adobe, invective noted. Maybe we c=
an start another thread and bitch about the stupidity of DRM in ebooks (som=
ething I particular hate, having witnessed idiotic things like 400 page ebo=
oks in university libraries with 1 day lending periods and the inability to=
copy text). Or maybe we can rail on about Adobe's sporadic on/off supp=
ort of Linux desktop users.
In the meantime, has anyone else actually tried the applicat=
ion? Building it on AUR now and it seems to have JACK support.<=
div class=3D"gmail_extra">On Tue, Oct 22=
, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net&g=
t; wrote:
On T=
ue, 2013-10-22 at 16:52 +0800, michael noble wrote:

br>
.sourceforge.net/

"The software is developed by Adobe Research and [snip]&qu=
ot;
- http=
://isse.sourceforge.net/about.html

Some time ago I purchased an ebook. What I got wasn't the book, but cra=
p
with metadata and they wanted that I register at Adobe regarding to DRM.
I didn't register at the Adobe website, so I lost the book I purchased.=

Adobe is a mafia.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@l=
ists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

--047d7b5dba7a21599c04e9513acc--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 8:52 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 11:38 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 22, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Dave Phillips, (Tue Oct 22, 1:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Thu Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Russell Hanaghan, (Fri Oct 25, 4:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Angel de Vicente, (Fri Oct 25, 8:33 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Oct 22, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Milan Lazecky, (Wed Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:10 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Oct 22, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 9:43 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Oct 22, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] new(ish?) open source source separation editor, michael noble, (Tue Oct 22, 11:08 am)