Re: [LAU] [OT] Open Source Portable Recorder?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: wes schreiner <wes@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 - 12:21 pm

--047d7b339c15fcad8604d2da1a3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:42 AM, wes schreiner wrote:

> On 01/09/2013 02:27 AM, Burkhard Woelfel wrote:

In both cases the intent is that you hit it immediately if you hear
something you wish to record, not minutes later. There are some devices
with longer buffers, 5 seconds for instance isn't to difficult to find, but
none with time frame in the minutes for example.

Seablade

--047d7b339c15fcad8604d2da1a3a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:42 AM, wes schreiner &lt=
;wes@infosink.com=

On 01/09/2013 02:27 AM, Bu=
rkhard Woelfel wrote:

What size is that buffer?

Not much. In the Tascam DR-40 it is two seconds. In the Zoom H4N it is two =
seconds unless recording 96KHz 4 channel, then it's only one second.
In both cases the intent is that you hit it immediately if you h=
ear something you wish to record, not minutes later.=A0 There are some devi=
ces with longer buffers, 5 seconds for instance isn't to difficult to f=
ind, but none with time frame in the minutes for example.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade

--047d7b339c15fcad8604d2da1a3a--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [OT] Open Source Portable Recorder?, wes schreiner, (Wed Jan 9, 8:43 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] Open Source Portable Recorder?, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Jan 9, 12:21 pm)