Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, January 28, 2013 - 9:58 am

On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 21:52 -1000, david wrote:

We had several threads about the sample rate, the resume is, that
usually for recording purpose 48 KHz is the best way to go, since most
devices perform at best at 48 KHz. There where arguments to use higher
rates for public address systems, no valid argument to use 44.1 KHz,
assumed your card shouldn't perform better at 44.1 KHz, something very
unlikely. If the audio device is ok at 48 KHz, higher rates won't make
the audio quality better, but lower rates will make it sound less good.

In all the decades working as audio engineer and privately having a home
studio I never have seen something other used than 48 KHz in
professional audio studios, just at home I've equipment that does sound
better at 96 KHz, but this gear anyway does sound less good as other
gear I use at 48 KHz.

Regards,
Ralf

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sat Jan 26, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Kaj Ailomaa, (Sat Jan 26, 11:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 12:04 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, david, (Sun Jan 27, 3:36 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 5:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, david, (Mon Jan 28, 7:52 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Jan 28, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 5:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 5:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 6:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Mon Jan 28, 12:43 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Folderol, (Sat Jan 26, 11:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Jan 26, 11:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sat Jan 26, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sat Jan 26, 11:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sat Jan 26, 11:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sat Jan 26, 11:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sat Jan 26, 11:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Len Ovens, (Sun Jan 27, 1:54 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 2:00 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 2:16 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 2:33 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 2:40 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 3:27 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Paul Davis, (Sun Jan 27, 2:22 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 2:31 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Jan 26, 11:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 12:06 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Jan 27, 12:13 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 12:15 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Jan 27, 12:29 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Bob van der Poel, (Sun Jan 27, 12:37 am)
Re: [LAU] I really need help with jack, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Jan 27, 1:09 am)