Re: [LAU] klang

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2012 - 2:28 pm

--0016e6d99ee0bc899f04c64938b8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Patrick Shirkey
wrote:

>

You misunderstood my comment. I have absolutely no issue with how Paul
responded, and he and I talked about it a little on #ardour even but
honestly I agree with him in pretty much every regard and trust that he
knows more about it and can comment on it far more throughly than I ever
could.

My issue, was with the exact comment that was quoted by Oon-Ee, which was
little more than trolling, and Oon-Ee was correct in his assesment in my
opinion. However I just wanted to clarify where the comment Oon-Ee qutoed
came from, which was from the Phoronix thread, not from any mailing list
thread so it was obviously confusing what was trying to be said as some
people thought it was directed to them when it wasn't.

The rest of your post has been pretty well addressed by others I believe so
I will leave that alone:)

Seablade

--0016e6d99ee0bc899f04c64938b8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Patrick =
Shirkey <pshirkey@boosthardware.com> wrote:

IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all
the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform
over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of<=
br>
the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the
courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list.
You misunderstood my comment.=A0 I have absolutel=
y no issue with how Paul responded, and he and I talked about it a little o=
n #ardour even but honestly I agree with him in pretty much every regard an=
d trust that he knows more about it and can comment on it far more throughl=
y than I ever could.
My issue, was with the exact comment that was quoted by Oon-Ee, which w=
as little more than trolling, and Oon-Ee was correct in his assesment in my=
opinion.=A0 However I just wanted to clarify where the comment Oon-Ee quto=
ed came from, which was from the Phoronix thread, not from any mailing list=
thread so it was obviously confusing what was trying to be said as some pe=
ople thought it was directed to them when it wasn't.
The rest of your post has been pretty well addressed by others I believ=
e so I will leave that alone:)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade<=
br>

--0016e6d99ee0bc899f04c64938b8--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] klang, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Jul 31, 8:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thijs van severen, (Tue Jul 31, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joel Roth, (Wed Aug 1, 4:56 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Wed Aug 1, 12:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 8:38 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 11:12 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Aug 2, 1:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 2:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Ken Restivo, (Thu Aug 2, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Brett McCoy, (Thu Aug 2, 1:51 pm)
[LAU] OT: klang, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Aug 5, 11:07 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Thu Aug 2, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 5:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 2, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Jeremy Jongepier, (Thu Aug 2, 2:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 1:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, michael noble, (Thu Aug 2, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 8:59 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 9:23 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Nils, (Thu Aug 2, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Tue Jul 31, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 1, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Rustom Mody, (Thu Aug 2, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 3:18 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Tue Jul 31, 9:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:18 pm)