Re: [LAU] klang

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2012 - 1:47 pm

On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:34:38 -0400
Paul Davis wrote:

He's got points there - Gnome's been problematic for a while. But unlike
other mainstream OSes, I have a lot of options as to my window/desktop
manager, and it doesn't seem useful to build up that much rage about it.

It seems like he would get along with Theo DeRaadt, who is also capable of
whipping himself into a frenzy. (Theo's latest rant over the Win8/UEFI
secure boot is a great example. He slammed RedHat and Canonical for
trying to figure out a working compromise, and even compared RH to MS.
Um, no.)

I think the klang project is a dead end, and it's too bad that all
that really comes out if it is more bitching about linux audio, which
is finally at a pretty good level for both the casual and power users
now.

--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] klang, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Jul 31, 8:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thijs van severen, (Tue Jul 31, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joel Roth, (Wed Aug 1, 4:56 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Wed Aug 1, 12:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 8:38 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 11:12 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Aug 2, 1:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 2:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Ken Restivo, (Thu Aug 2, 7:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Brett McCoy, (Thu Aug 2, 1:51 pm)
[LAU] OT: klang, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Aug 5, 11:07 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Thu Aug 2, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 5:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 2, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Jeremy Jongepier, (Thu Aug 2, 2:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 1:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, michael noble, (Thu Aug 2, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 8:59 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 9:23 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Nils, (Thu Aug 2, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Tue Jul 31, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 1, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Rustom Mody, (Thu Aug 2, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 3:18 am)
Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Tue Jul 31, 9:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:18 pm)