Re: [LAU] klang

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: michael noble <looplog@...>

To: Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@...>

Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] klang

Date: Thursday, August 2, 2012 - 9:16 am

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:

quoted text

> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona wrote:
>> Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem to
>> react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
>>
> I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
> you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
> end of KLANG then!"
>
> Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?

I don't think this is about the Internet so much, and nor is it a
pissing match. The guy basically came out and said *everything* in
linux audio is broken, and the only way to fix it is to start
everything from scratch. With everything in life, if you take an
extreme position you should expect extreme responses, and also be
prepared to back up your claims.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] klang, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Jul 31, 8:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Thijs van severen, (Tue Jul 31, 9:02 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:03 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Joel Roth, (Wed Aug 1, 4:56 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:01 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Wed Aug 1, 12:09 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Wed Aug 1, 12:34 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 8:38 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 11:12 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Aug 2, 1:19 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Aug 2, 2:28 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:38 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Ken Restivo, (Thu Aug 2, 7:26 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Brett McCoy, (Thu Aug 2, 1:51 pm)

[LAU] OT: klang, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Aug 5, 11:07 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Thu Aug 2, 5:33 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 5:36 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 2, 1:37 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Jeremy Jongepier, (Thu Aug 2, 2:19 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 1:34 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Joe Hartley, (Thu Aug 2, 1:47 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, michael noble, (Thu Aug 2, 9:16 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 2, 8:59 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Oon-Ee Ng, (Thu Aug 2, 9:23 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Nils, (Thu Aug 2, 9:04 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Tue Jul 31, 9:06 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 1, 7:50 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Rustom Mody, (Thu Aug 2, 2:53 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Paul Davis, (Thu Aug 2, 3:18 am)

Re: [LAU] klang, Folderol, (Tue Jul 31, 9:32 pm)

Re: [LAU] klang, Louigi Verona, (Tue Jul 31, 9:18 pm)