Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, June 15, 2012 - 6:45 pm

On 06/15/2012 04:46 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

The real reason for vendor rejection of Firewire is the higher cost of
licensing Firewire vs USB. Margins on hardware are almost non-existent,
so every little bit of cost lowered helps.

--
David
gnome@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://clanjones.org/david/
http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Jun 15, 1:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Jun 15, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, david, (Fri Jun 15, 6:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Jun 18, 7:12 am)
Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Jun 15, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future, Thomas Vecchione, (Fri Jun 15, 3:23 pm)