--14dae93407ab6de8cf04bf5e560d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printableOn Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf wr=
ote:> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 22:01 -1000, david wrote:
Ive been running upgrading on a debian (testing) system.
Then one day I saw the dreaded word "pulseaudio" in the list of proposed
updates and I quickly hit the Ctrl-C. Been much more careful about
updating/upgrading thereafter.
So is the recommended solution to stay with xfce now and ditch gnome?
--14dae93407ab6de8cf04bf5e560d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mar=
dorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 22:01 -1000, david wrote:
AFAIK this isn't true, but when Debian updated my GNOME 2 to GNOM=
E 3 a
long time ago, GNOME 3 and GNOME 3 in "fake GNOME 2" mode did nee=
d much
more CPU resources, than GNOME 2 did need.
Xfce4 and LXDE anyway do provide the common workflow, that is used by
studios. I guess most engineers are accustomed to a workflow similar to
KDE3, GNOME2, Win 98 se, Win XP etc..
IMO both, Xfce and LXDE are very good to use and I don't miss that much=
of what I was accustomed to, when I used GNOME 2. I recommend not to use
GNOME 3.
0.02=80,
RalfIve been running upgrading on a debian (test=
ing) system.Then one day I saw the dreaded word "pulseaudio" =
in the list of proposed updates and I quickly hit the Ctrl-C. Been much mor=
e careful about updating/upgrading thereafter.
So is the recommended solution to stay with xfce now and ditch gnome?
--14dae93407ab6de8cf04bf5e560d--
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.