Re: [LAU] denoising audio files

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Folderol <folderol@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 - 5:18 pm

--f46d0408d3bf0c828104c0b7518d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Folderol wrote:

> On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:43:35 -1000

So after this conversation I decided to go check and see if there had been
improvements in the noise reduction in Audacity. There has been, and
fairly significant, at least it is usable now for certain materials, but it
still doesn't hold much against other solutions out there. Granted I only
checked with a boom recording from a shoot I did a little bit back, but yes
there are definitely still artifacts there, and possibly worse is a
reduction(Not huge, but noticable) of consonant sounds reducing
intelligibility slightly, especially on quieter parts.

Still overall much better than it used to be, and if I needed to do a quick
cleanup I might consider it now at least, that is a huge step from where it
was. But my preferred method is still using some proprietary plugins I own
for this.

Seablade

--f46d0408d3bf0c828104c0b7518d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Foldero=
l <folderol@ukfsn.org> wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 09:43:35 -1000<=
br>
david <gnome@hawaii.rr.com&gt=
; wrote:

> High dynamic range classical music was exactly what a friend of mine w=
as

> them from a high-end turntable through an Audiophile 2496. Then cleane=
d

e is

Horses for courses...
I find Audacity works perfectly well for noise reduction on vocal or
non-distorted guitar tracks. Anything with a lot of treble content seems
to develop a background 'mush' underneath the audio, but not there =
in the
silences.
So after this conv=
ersation I decided to go check and see if there had been improvements in th=
e noise reduction in Audacity.=A0 There has been, and fairly significant, a=
t least it is usable now for certain materials, but it still doesn't ho=
ld much against other solutions out there.=A0 Granted I only checked with a=
boom recording from a shoot I did a little bit back, but yes there are def=
initely still artifacts there, and possibly worse is a reduction(Not huge, =
but noticable) of consonant sounds reducing intelligibility slightly, espec=
ially on quieter parts.
Still overall much better than it used to be, and if I needed to do a q=
uick cleanup I might consider it now at least, that is a huge step from whe=
re it was.=A0 But my preferred method is still using some proprietary plugi=
ns I own for this.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade

--f46d0408d3bf0c828104c0b7518d--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] denoising audio files, Iain Mott, (Mon May 21, 10:04 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Julius Smith, (Wed May 23, 5:25 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Mon May 21, 2:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon May 21, 9:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Jaromír Mikeš, (Thu May 24, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Georg Holzmann, (Thu May 24, 11:05 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Hartmut Noack, (Wed May 23, 9:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu May 24, 1:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Kevin Cosgrove, (Thu May 24, 2:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu May 24, 2:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Thu May 24, 5:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Tue May 22, 3:04 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, david, (Tue May 22, 8:37 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Tue May 22, 1:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, david, (Tue May 22, 7:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue May 22, 10:36 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, david, (Tue May 22, 7:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Tue May 22, 7:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, david, (Wed May 23, 5:09 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Folderol, (Tue May 22, 7:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed May 23, 5:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Tue May 22, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Emanuel Rumpf, (Tue May 22, 2:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue May 22, 3:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue May 22, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, hermann, (Tue May 22, 2:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Tue May 22, 3:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Ricardus Vincente, (Mon May 21, 9:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Lorenzo Sutton, (Tue May 22, 7:22 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue May 22, 10:35 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Lorenzo Sutton, (Mon May 21, 11:43 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Julien Claassen, (Mon May 21, 10:15 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Georg Holzmann, (Mon May 21, 10:11 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Mon May 21, 10:08 am)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Thomas Vecchione, (Mon May 21, 5:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] denoising audio files, Kevin Cosgrove, (Wed May 23, 12:22 am)