linuxaudio.org

--20cf30334683416e7b04c04ef4ac

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Robert!
I've been following OOM with much interest although I've not got round to

trying the latest svn version of Muse yet to see where its parent project

is up to now in comparison - I will hopefully remedy that this weekend.
However, looking at the specs of Muse 2.0 there is one glaring omission -

no support for LV2!? Will the final release support audio and MIDI plugins

using the now stable LV2 spec or not?
Signed
FOSS plugin patrol UK
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Jonsson  wrote:
> Hi Brent,

quoted text
>

> 2012/5/16 Brent Busby :

> > Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer think of the beta 2.x

> > release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to stick

> > with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?

>

> Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say that the

> beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.

> As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very

> good for me.

>

> Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.

>

> Regards,

> Robert

>

> >

> > --

> > + Brent A. Busby         +      "Some of them ate, some of them

> > + Sr. UNIX Systems Admin +      laughed, and some of them picked

> > + University of Chicago  +      up a nine gallon can of paint at

> > + James Franck Institute +      Kmart for only .99."

> > _______________________________________________

> > Linux-audio-user mailing list

> > Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-user mailing list

> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

>

--20cf30334683416e7b04c04ef4ac

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Robert!I've been following OOM with much interest although I=

've not got round to trying the latest svn version of Muse yet to see w=

here its parent project is up to now in comparison - I will hopefully remed=

y that this weekend.

However, looking at the specs of Muse 2.0 there is one glaring omission=

 - no support for LV2!? Will the final release support audio and MIDI plugi=

ns using the now stable LV2 spec or not?SignedFOSS plugin p=

atrol UK

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Jons=

son <spamatica@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Brent,
2012/5/16 Brent Busby <brent@keyc=

orner.org>:

quoted text
> Just wondering what those who use Muse sequencer thi=

nk of the beta 2.x

quoted text
> release versus 1.x for usability/stability...or would it be best to st=

ick

quoted text
> with 1.x for actually getting projects done for now?

Being a bit biased as I'm part of MusE's dev team I would say=

 that the

beta, or even better, the latest svn is much better than 1.1.

As you may know I dabble a bit with Using MusE also and it works very

good for me.
Still, do tell us if you encounter any problem.
Regards,

Robert
>

quoted text
> --

> + Brent A. Busby =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 + =A0 =A0 =A0"Some of them ate, =

some of them

quoted text
> + Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + =A0 =A0 =A0laughed, and some of them picked=

> + University of Chicago =A0+ =A0 =A0 =A0up a nine gallon can of paint =

at

quoted text
> + James Franck Institute + =A0 =A0 =A0Kmart for only .99."

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-user mailing list

> Linux-audio-u=

ser@lists.linuxaudio.org

quoted text
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@l=

ists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

--20cf30334683416e7b04c04ef4ac--