Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>
Cc: LAU <Linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, April 16, 2012 - 9:24 pm

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:54:45PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

Okay, so for a standard 2 periods of 128 frames each, my nominal dddelay
is 256 frames or 5.3ms at a sr of 48k, twice that for a round-trip.

>

I did, but clearly, I'm missing something. When using "jack_lsp -l" to
get latency, I get: 384 frames for system:playback_*, which is right
for my set-up, 128 frames for system:capture_*, and 0 frames for
jconvolver, which can't be rright. Shouldn't the least it can be 384
frames (-p128 -n3)?

>

Is that value an absolute or relative to the nominal latency?

Cheers,
S.M.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Estimating JACK latency, S. Massy, (Mon Apr 16, 7:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Paul Davis, (Mon Apr 16, 8:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Joel Roth, (Sun May 13, 12:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Paul Davis, (Sun May 13, 12:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, S. Massy, (Mon Apr 16, 9:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Apr 17, 5:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Joel Roth, (Thu May 3, 2:52 am)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu May 3, 10:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, S. Massy, (Thu May 3, 4:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Joel Roth, (Thu May 3, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Joel Roth, (Thu May 3, 2:27 am)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Robin Gareus, (Thu May 3, 8:21 am)
Re: [LAU] Estimating JACK latency, Paul Davis, (Mon Apr 16, 9:38 pm)