Re: [LAU] connect ports with jack1 vs jack2 (was: Re: Qjackclt cramps)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2012 - 3:41 pm

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:25:46PM +0100, Giso Grimm wrote:

> Neither jack 0.121.2 nor jack 1.9.7 does produce xruns (like those

Jack1 will skip cycles if necessary. This may sound like an xrun
if takes too long, but it's a different thing altogether.

A more basic problem seems to me that *every* port creation/destruction/
connection/disconnection will mean a callback into every client which
has these enabled. This just doesn't scale when a script, session manager
or even a single big app (e.g. Ardour) performs hundreds of those ops
within a second.

Ciao,

--
FA

Vor uns liegt ein weites Tal, die Sonne scheint - ein Glitzerstrahl.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] connect ports with jack1 vs jack2 (was: Re: Qjackc..., Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Mar 8, 3:41 pm)