Re: [LAU] midi file editing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nils <list@...>
Cc: lau <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 - 2:09 pm

--e89a8f3ba9595fe15704bb3484fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Nils wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:11:17 +0530

Hi Nils
Yes I am aware that midi is a lower level information than score.
I did not make it very clear in my question earlier (sorry about that) that
this particular piece
-- bach C# minor fugue --
is not specifically important to me as working out a workflow which allows
lifting a given midi to a higher score level. Nted does a decent job of
this. Musescore less so. Just searching for the best tool.
Earlier I used nted exclusively. Since now I have a bunch of non-musician
non-linux users getting interested I need something cross platform -- hence
musescore.

Currently my modus operandi (when starting with a midi file):
Read into nted.
Export midi staff by staff separately.
Read each of those midis separately into musescore
Paste together.

And so I am just looking for some better tools...

--e89a8f3ba9595fe15704bb3484fd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Nils <list@nilsgey.de&=
gt; wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:11:17 +0530
Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.=
com
> wrote:

> The attached file is a Bach fu=
gue midi I found somewhere on the net.

s)

> treble clef.

file
//musescore.org/en/node/15501
g.
d

There is only one problem here: "midi I found somewhere on=
the net."

The solution is: Don't convert midi to notation, it makes no sense and =
is futile.

What you got here is
Bach, Das Wohltemperierte Clavier I, Fuga IV (BWV 849)

Visit http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?i=
d=3D596
and you get the notation as PDF, the lilypond source file, a mi=
di and more information.
Hi NilsYes I am aware that midi is a lower level =
information than score.I did not make it very clear in my question earl=
ier (sorry about that) that this particular piece -- bach C# minor fugu=
e --
is not specifically important to me as working out a workflow which allows =
lifting a given midi to a higher score level.=A0 Nted does a decent job of =
this. Musescore less so.=A0 Just searching for the best tool.Earlier I =
used nted exclusively. Since now I have a bunch of non-musician non-linux u=
sers getting interested I need something cross platform -- hence musescore.=

Currently my modus operandi (when starting with a midi file):Read i=
nto nted.Export midi staff by staff separately.Read each of those m=
idis separately into musescorePaste together.And so I am just l=
ooking for some better tools...

--e89a8f3ba9595fe15704bb3484fd--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] midi file editing, Rustom Mody, (Wed Mar 14, 12:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Lorenzo Sutton, (Fri Mar 16, 10:41 am)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Nils, (Wed Mar 14, 1:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Rustom Mody, (Wed Mar 14, 2:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Renato, (Wed Mar 14, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, david, (Wed Mar 14, 6:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Rustom Mody, (Thu Mar 15, 3:55 am)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Fred, (Thu Mar 15, 6:08 am)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Rustom Mody, (Thu Mar 15, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, rosea.grammostola, (Wed Mar 14, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Rustom Mody, (Wed Mar 14, 1:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, david, (Wed Mar 14, 6:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, Renato, (Wed Mar 14, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] midi file editing, david, (Wed Mar 14, 6:51 pm)