Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 11, 2012 - 10:26 am

>> /harmonyseq/sync - forces harmonySEQ to stop playing the current bar

I'm not sure if I understood your problem, but if you are sending a
OSC sync command to harmonySEQ on each bar, then this indeed may cause
some problems - the proper approach is to set harmonySEQ's tempo to
exactly the same as other applications use, and send /harmonyseq/sync
*just once* - and this will keep them synchronised.
Though I like Fons' suggestion concerning jumping to the nearest bar,
that seems a reasonable solution, will try to implement that once.

>> /harmonyseq/event T - triggers OSC event with tag T (integer), and

Maybe I wasn't clear about the tags - these have nothing to do with
OSC's own tags, and are indeed predefined, so that harmonySEQ will
react the same manner each time.
Adding a new OSC event in harmonySEQ you need to specify a parameter -
let's say you chose 5. Then harmonySEQ will trigger this event if and
only if it gets a '/harmonyseq/event 5' OSC message. This way you can
have a bunch of events, each with different parameter (this parameter
is called 'tag', but it's just a matter of naming), and you can choose
which one you want to trigger, by selecting the appropriate number
with a /harmonyseq/event X message.
I hope it's clearer now.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 3:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Mon Feb 13, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 13, 6:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Feb 14, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Tue Feb 14, 6:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Feb 14, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Feb 8, 5:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Wed Feb 8, 5:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Feb 8, 8:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, hermann, (Wed Feb 8, 8:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Hartmut Noack, (Tue Feb 7, 8:34 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, PMA, (Mon Feb 6, 8:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Mon Feb 6, 8:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 8:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Sat Feb 11, 12:29 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Sat Feb 11, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Sun Feb 12, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Feb 11, 10:08 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Louigi Verona, (Tue Feb 7, 4:23 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, James Mckernon, (Mon Feb 6, 5:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, mark hadman, (Mon Feb 6, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 7:58 pm)