Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafał Cieślak <rafalcieslak256@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 11, 2012 - 12:29 am

--14dae934050f8830ea04b8a55417
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Rafa=C5=82 Cie=C5=9Blak wrote:

> Note that harmonySEQ uses OSC

Good stuff, I'm an OSC fan myself :)

The supported messages include:

[snip]
Good stuff, all essential functionality for integrating Luppp & HarmonySeq
is available :)

/harmonyseq/sync - forces harmonySEQ to stop playing the current bar

I'm a little confused on how this is a very useful event to send: If I send
it as Luppp goes on to the next bar, it may only be recieved when
HarmonySeq *is* already on the next bar, and then HarmonySeq will skip a
bar...

A nasty hack would be to wait until on the 1st beat of the bar, then send
the /sync and hope that they stay in sync after that... I'm not really sure
how to fix this properly... do you have any ideas? :)

/harmonyseq/event T - triggers OSC event with tag T (integer), and

These are arbitrary "tag" numbers right? It would be great if there was a
"pre defined" set of tags that I could code Luppp to send, and then
HarmonySeq would respond in the same manner each time.

For now a workaround would be to create an OSC tag for each of the Scenes
in Luppp, and that OSC tag will enable disable the state of HarmonySeq to
perform the part that is needed.

I've got the OSC sending in Luppp pretty much implemented, just the sync is
a show stopper at the moment. I'd like to get this fixed promptly :D -Harry

--14dae934050f8830ea04b8a55417
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Rafa=C5=82 Cie=
=C5=9Blak <rafalcieslak256@gmail.com> wrote:

Note that harmonySEQ uses OSCGood stuff, I'm an O=
SC fan myself :)

The supported messages include:[snip]Good stuff, =
all essential functionality for integrating Luppp & HarmonySeq is avail=
able :)

/harmonyseq/sync - forces harmonySEQ to stop playing the current bar
and immediately skip to the next one - useful for synchronizationI'm a little confused on how this is a very useful event to=
send: If I send it as Luppp goes on to the next bar, it may only be reciev=
ed when HarmonySeq *is* already on the next bar, and then HarmonySeq will s=
kip a bar...
A nasty hack would be to wait until on the 1st beat of the bar, then se=
nd the /sync and hope that they stay in sync after that... I'm not real=
ly sure how to fix this properly... do you have any ideas? :)

/harmonyseq/event T - triggers OSC event with tag T (integer), and
executes actions bound to it.These are arbitrary &quo=
t;tag" numbers right? It would be great if there was a "pre defin=
ed" set of tags that I could code Luppp to send, and then HarmonySeq w=
ould respond in the same manner each time.
For now a workaround would be to create an OSC tag for each of the Scen=
es in Luppp, and that OSC tag will enable disable the state of HarmonySeq t=
o perform the part that is needed.I've got the OSC sending in L=
uppp pretty much implemented, just the sync is a show stopper at the moment=
. I'd like to get this fixed promptly :D -Harry
=C2=A0

--14dae934050f8830ea04b8a55417--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 3:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Mon Feb 13, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 13, 6:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Feb 14, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Tue Feb 14, 6:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Edgar Aichinger, (Tue Feb 14, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Feb 8, 5:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Wed Feb 8, 5:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Feb 8, 8:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, hermann, (Wed Feb 8, 8:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Hartmut Noack, (Tue Feb 7, 8:34 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, PMA, (Mon Feb 6, 8:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Mon Feb 6, 8:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 8:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Sat Feb 11, 12:29 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Sat Feb 11, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Harry van Haaren, (Sun Feb 12, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Feb 11, 10:08 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Louigi Verona, (Tue Feb 7, 4:23 am)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, James Mckernon, (Mon Feb 6, 5:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, mark hadman, (Mon Feb 6, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] harmonySEQ 0.16, Rafał Cieślak, (Mon Feb 6, 7:58 pm)