Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arnold Krille <arnold@...>
Cc: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, December 25, 2012 - 11:55 am

--e89a8ff24a53d58e5e04d1abfdf0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:

>

Just to clarify, since i think you were referencing the x32, this isn't
Behringer's first digital mixer. They for example had the ddx3216 for some
time, their version of the Yamaha O1v. And I have heard good things about
the x32 in particular, but I am not holding my breath right now due to my
experience with them in the past.

Seablade

--e89a8ff24a53d58e5e04d1abfdf0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On T=
ue, Dec 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@arnoldarts.de&gt=
; wrote:

While Behringer looks to be good value for its money (and is so for
example with its first digital mixer), Just to clarify, since i think you were referencing the x32, this isn'=
t Behringer's first digital mixer.=A0 They for example had the ddx3216 =
for some time, their version of the Yamaha O1v.=A0 And I have heard good th=
ings about the x32 in particular, but I am not holding my breath right now =
due to my experience with them in the past.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade

--e89a8ff24a53d58e5e04d1abfdf0--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Dec 22, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., John Murphy, (Sun Dec 23, 3:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 10:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Florian Faber, (Sun Dec 23, 5:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ben Bell, (Sun Dec 23, 3:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 10:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Dec 23, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Joe Hartley, (Mon Dec 24, 3:22 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 24, 9:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 24, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ben Bell, (Mon Dec 24, 4:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 4:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Dec 26, 11:22 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Dec 26, 4:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 25, 11:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Tue Dec 25, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 25, 12:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Paul Davis, (Mon Dec 24, 4:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 5:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Brent Busby, (Mon Dec 24, 4:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Moshe Werner, (Mon Dec 24, 9:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Monty Montgomery, (Sun Dec 23, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Dec 24, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 11:10 pm)