Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>
Cc: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, December 24, 2012 - 5:02 pm

--e89a8ff1cae04b731504d19c2a3f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Paul Davis wrote:

>

Well most describe their ad for the DL-1608 as 'original' if not the best:)

You note I did not include Loud Technologies as a reference to who
advertises the most though, they still do a LOT of advertising, I would
have to think about it between who I see more advertising from, Behringer
or them;) Of course Bose beats both of them, but that is a different can
of worms.

Seablade

--e89a8ff1cae04b731504d19c2a3f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Paul Davis <=
paul@linuxa=
udiosystems.com
> wrote:
at one time, they had the BEST ads in the industry, =
sadly no more

Well most describe =
their ad for the DL-1608 as 'original' if not the best:)You note I did not include Loud Technologies =
as a reference to who advertises the most though, they still do a LOT of ad=
vertising, I would have to think about it between who I see more advertisin=
g from, Behringer or them;)=A0 Of course Bose beats both of them, but that =
is a different can of worms.
=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seablade

--e89a8ff1cae04b731504d19c2a3f--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Dec 22, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., John Murphy, (Sun Dec 23, 3:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 10:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Florian Faber, (Sun Dec 23, 5:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ben Bell, (Sun Dec 23, 3:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 10:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Dec 23, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Joe Hartley, (Mon Dec 24, 3:22 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 24, 9:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 24, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ben Bell, (Mon Dec 24, 4:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 4:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Dec 26, 11:22 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Dec 26, 4:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 25, 11:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Tue Dec 25, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Arnold Krille, (Tue Dec 25, 12:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Paul Davis, (Mon Dec 24, 4:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Dec 24, 5:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Brent Busby, (Mon Dec 24, 4:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Moshe Werner, (Mon Dec 24, 9:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Monty Montgomery, (Sun Dec 23, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Dec 24, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant., Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 23, 11:10 pm)