linuxaudio.org

--bcaec5540890f2a9e704d177fe41

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:44 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:

quoted text
> >

> >

> >

> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf

> >  wrote:

> >         On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:

> >         > On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> >         > > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murphy wrote:

> >         > >> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out?

> >         > >

> >         > > Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed there would

> >         be cheap cards

> >         > > with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only has got one

> >         ADAT, that btw.

> >         > > does not work with Linux.

> >

> >

> > and what card would that be?

>

> RME HDSPe AIO

>

> >         ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz. Nobody will use 44.1KHz

> >         for

> >         pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue.

> >

> > the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop?

> >

> > ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard", it

> > can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across

> > two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available

> > channels.

>

> Can you give an example for misinformation by me?

>

>

> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/0135...

>

> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/0135...

>

i have at least 3 ADAT equipped devices that support 44.1kHz via ADAT.
claiming that ADAT cannot support 44.1kHz is just wrong.
--bcaec5540890f2a9e704d177fe41

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, D=

ec 22, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net<=

/a>> wrote:

On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:4=

4 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:

quoted text
>

>

>

> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf

> <ralf.mardorf@alice-d=

sl.net> wrote:

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf w=

rote:

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murp=

hy wrote:

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > >> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out?

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > >

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed=

 there would

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be cheap cards

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only h=

as got one

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ADAT, that btw.

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > does not work with Linux.

>

>

> and what card would that be?

RME HDSPe AIO
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz. Nobody will use 4=

4.1KHz

quoted text
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue.

>

> the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop?

>

> ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard&q=

uot;, it

quoted text
> can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across<=

br>

quoted text
> two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available<=

br>

quoted text
> channels.

Can you give an example for misinformation by me?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freeb=

sd-multimedia/2012-November/013570.html

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freeb=

sd-multimedia/2012-November/013572.htmli have=

 at least 3 ADAT equipped devices that support 44.1kHz via ADAT.

claiming that ADAT cannot support 44.1kHz is just wrong. 
--bcaec5540890f2a9e704d177fe41--