Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering software

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Roger <gurusonic@...>, <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2012 - 12:28 am

------9OX7BKDPAWCXLK5XLJ9E32ADR5Y9PB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8

The freedom is gone lost with any acept bit of close source.

--
Diese Nac=
hricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit WEB.DE Mail gesendet.

R=
oger schrieb:

On 11/26/2012 07:23 AM, Fons Adriaense=
n wrote:

ou're not likely to get any respect from this community unless/until you
release your source code under a free/libre license. Who have spent decade=
s
reely
ct is
IMHO the above.
r4 source
=
) community. It should not be any pretext for ad-hominem
n't forget that many on this list are using things
on 'borderline insulting' as well ?
Agreed totally, Fons. Freedom include=
s the freedom to licence your
software how you want and the freedom to cho=
ose which software you use.
If you only want to use libre/OSS then you are=
free to do that.
The negative comment was definitely uncalled for.

Roger
=
_____________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing lis=
t
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinf=
o/linux-audio-user

------9OX7BKDPAWCXLK5XLJ9E32ADR5Y9PB
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The freedom is gone lost with any acept bit of clo=
se source.

--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobilt=
elefon mit WEB.DE Mail gesendet.

Roger <gurusonic@gmail.com> schrieb:
On 11/26/2012 07:23 AM, Fons Adriaense=
n wrote:> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:05:44PM -0800, J. Liles wrote=
:>>> You're not likely to get any respect from this co=
mmunity unless/until you>> release your source code under a fre=
e/libre license. Who have spent decades>> and 10's of thousands=
of hours working on projects that we give away freely>> and op=
enly, your software is irrelevant and your request for respect is>=

it's IMHO the above.>> While I can't imagine any good rea=
son for keeping mixer4 source> code closed, the only consequence t=
his should (and will) bring> is the reduced amount of support the =
author will get from this> (LAU/LAD) community. It should not be a=
ny pretext for ad-hominem> comments. And don't forget that many on=
this list are using things> like Mixbus. Is Harrison 'borderline =
insulting' as well ?>Agreed totally, Fons. Freedom includes =
the freedom to licence your software how you want and the freedom to =
choose which software you use. If you only want to use libre/OSS then=
you are free to do that.The negative comment was definitely uncalled=
for.RogerLinux-audio-user mailing list=
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.orghttp://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linu=
x-audio-user

------9OX7BKDPAWCXLK5XLJ9E32ADR5Y9PB--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering soft..., brummer-, (Mon Nov 26, 12:28 am)
Re: [LAU] looking for command-line/scriptable mastering soft..., Bob van der Poel, (Mon Nov 26, 12:49 am)