Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - 8:21 am

--047d7b6225703e879904cd56967e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2012/10/31 david

> On 10/30/2012 07:55 PM, Raffaele Morelli wrote:

indeed, there's no use in it and it is quite dangerous (euphemism here) and
you should not reccommend it to other users.

it's well known that the majority of ubuntu packages is taken from debian
unstable and, no matter how you try and how simple is your target,
installing unstable packages on testing or stable will result in a neverend
dependencies war - 100%.

regards
-r

--
*L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata
all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti, alla
protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti)
*

--047d7b6225703e879904cd56967e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012/10/31 david <gnome@hawaii.rr.com>
On 10/30/2012 07:55 PM, Raffaele Morelli wrote:

2012/10/30 david <gnome@hawaii.rr.com <mailto:gnome@hawaii.rr.com>>

=A0 =A0 You can use Ubuntu repositories with Debian.

I wonder what you use to resolve depedencies then...

-r

I never used it for anything ambitious. Anything I've really needed, De=
bian has had. And I don't need anything unique to Ubuntu, such as the U=
nity interface.indeed, there's no use =
in it and it is quite dangerous (euphemism here) and you should not reccomm=
end it to other users.
it's well known that the majority of ubuntu package=
s is taken from debian unstable and, no matter how you try and how simple i=
s your target, installing unstable packages on testing or stable will resul=
t in a neverend dependencies war - 100%.
regards-r=A0-- L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista =
una,
resta affidata all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita
in progetti, alla protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti)

--047d7b6225703e879904cd56967e--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Oct 29, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Oct 29, 9:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Len Ovens, (Mon Oct 29, 11:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 30, 12:13 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Oct 30, 5:26 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 30, 5:52 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Oct 30, 6:23 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Oct 31, 5:56 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Oct 31, 8:21 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, R. Mattes, (Tue Oct 30, 5:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 30, 6:17 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 30, 4:52 am)
Re: [LAU] debian wheezy vs pulseaudio vs jackdbus, Paul Davis, (Tue Oct 30, 5:28 pm)