>
> On Tue, October 30, 2012 4:26 pm, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
>> 2012/10/30 Patrick Shirkey
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, October 30, 2012 10:11 am, Len Ovens wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, October 29, 2012 2:45 pm, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, October 30, 2012 8:35 am, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Does anyone know whats going on with pulseaudio-module-jackdbus in
>>> >>> Debian
>>> >>> Wheezy?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On my system the jackdbus module doesn't exist in the repos and the
>>> >>> result
>>> >>> is that pulseaudio doesn't play nice with jack.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I can see that jackd2 was compiled with dbus support so not sure
>>> what's
>>> >>> going on with the missing pulse module.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> I can see with pacmd list-modules that module-jackdbus-connect is
>>> loaded
>>> >> so the module must be compiled into pulse directly.
>>> >>
>>> >> So any thoughts on why the module is not kicking in?
>>> >
>>> > On ubuntu (which normally uses debian src packages), The module name
>>> is
>>> > module-jackdbus-detect. I don't think I have seen a module called
>>> > module-jackdbus-connect even on the pulse site.
>>> >
>>>
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/M...
>>> >
>>>
>>> You got the gist...
>>>
>>> > Even if jackd comes with dbus support, it can be started without. so
>>> use
>>> > ps x or similar to check that the running app is jackdbus and not
>>> jackd.
>>>
>>> There is no jackdbus on debian wheezy, just "jackd" or "jackd2".
>>
>>
>> jackdbus is in debian wheezy and it comes with jackd2 package.
>>
>>
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=wheezy&arch=any&mode=path&search...
>>
>
> You're correct. When I looked yesterday I had jackd and jackd2. Today I
> have jackd and jackdbus instead.
>
> No wonder people get confused about how to get this stuff working.
>
> What possible reason is there to have jackd and jackd2 *or* jackd and
> jackdbus ?
>
> The former must be for jack1 package and the later for the jack2 package
> but why would there even be a jackd2 option for the jack1 package? It's
> completely redundant.
>
> And why isn't a jackd2 option installed with the jack2 package?
>