Re: [LAU] netjack vs netjack2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 - 2:33 pm

On 10/03/2012 04:23 PM, Paul Davis wrote:

_NET_jack:

http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack
http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack2

netjack2 can discover slaves/master automatically (it uses multicast).
netjack2 has support for per-port latency which is transmitted between
all clients.

netjack1 is more robust regarding lost packets - that is usually only of
concern if you're sending data over a WAN. AFAIK netjack2 has no support
concerning package loss.

ciao,
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] netjack vs netjack2, Grant, (Wed Oct 3, 2:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack vs netjack2, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 3, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack vs netjack2, Robin Gareus, (Wed Oct 3, 2:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack vs netjack2, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 3, 2:46 pm)