Re: [LAU] Any Linux distro with Jack and Pulseaudio working right?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <len@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, October 28, 2012 - 8:50 pm

--f46d043085542417ff04cd24b40c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Len Ovens wrote:

>

i am not sure that the d-bus based reservation scheme identifies who is
asking to take control. i could be wrong.

--f46d043085542417ff04cd24b40c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Len Ove=
ns <len@ovenwerks.net> wrote:

On Sun, October 28, 2012 1:18 pm, Brett McCoy wrote:

ack
br>

> use. Nothing is going to stop a user from killing either Jack or PA,

No they are not run as root normally. Pulse can be but I am not sure =
about
jack... or rather I am not sure what problems would be encountered.
Running pulse as system is not recommended unless more than one user may
be logged in at once that will both need sound (two x-sessions) because
there is a loss of useability (some features go away).

There are some things that could happen to pulse that would make it work a<=
br>
lot better with Jack... when pulse finds out jack is taking away one of
it's hardware ports, it would be really nice if pulse transferred all i=
t's
settings for that port to the jack sink/source ports.=
i am not sure that the d-bus based reservation scheme identifies who is=
asking to take control. i could be wrong.

--f46d043085542417ff04cd24b40c--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Any Linux distro with Jack and Pulseaudio working ..., Paul Davis, (Sun Oct 28, 8:50 pm)