Re: [LAU] Fairlight

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 - 10:10 pm

On Thu, October 25, 2012 8:30 am, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

Above you said "every time". I was pointing out that it is not everytime.

>> Look at Groove OS too. Rui and Christian fed back a huge amount of their

If you care to do some research Dominic has personally offered to do just
that for anyone who was interested even going so far as to offer to put
all his applicable code online. Given that Christian and Rui wrote the
Majority of it and have already opensourced most of the useful stuff there
doesn't seem to be any specific purpose to push harder than that. The code
is open and both Rui and christian are very active contributors to LAD so
logic and rational suggests there is nothing to be gained by jumping up
and down about the issue.

>> In this case Fairlight may just not be aware of their explicit legal

Please explain why it would be a negative thing for the Consortium to take
on such a role?

Would you prefer for random people with no specific affiliation to do the
job or would you prefer for it to not be done at all?

Are you suggesting that there is nothing to be gained from politely
alerting companies of their legal obligations before they get into
trouble?

--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Wed Oct 24, 3:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 3:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Kaza Kore, (Wed Oct 24, 6:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 11:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Thu Oct 25, 12:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Brett McCoy, (Thu Oct 25, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 9:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 8:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 9:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 10:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:03 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Thu Oct 25, 1:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Simon Wise, (Thu Oct 25, 2:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Robin Gareus, (Thu Oct 25, 2:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Thu Oct 25, 3:38 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 1:44 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, david, (Wed Oct 24, 7:09 pm)