Re: [LAU] Fairlight

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 - 9:28 pm

On Wednesday 24 October 2012 17:16:20 Patrick Shirkey did opine:
Gene wrote:

> > While I'm 100% in agreement Patrick, I'll have to confess that my

Not much has changed in 20 years then I'd have to say. And, I'd guess that
to effect any real, draw a line in the sand results, that query should
probably come from the FSF, whom I think has power of attorney over 99% of
the kernel code and libraries. But we both know that Aussie companies tend
to do their own thing and may need to be prodded gently by the AU office of
the FSF if there is such a thing.

I don't have an oar in this water personally, but it seems someone here
should know who to contact at the FSF to "get the ball off center if not
actually rolling" ;-)

Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: is up!
QOTD:
"When she hauled ass, it took three trips."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Wed Oct 24, 3:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 3:57 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Kaza Kore, (Wed Oct 24, 6:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Len Ovens, (Wed Oct 24, 11:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Thu Oct 25, 12:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Brett McCoy, (Thu Oct 25, 1:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 7:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 9:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 8:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 9:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 9:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Wed Oct 24, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 10:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:03 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Oct 24, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, michael noble, (Thu Oct 25, 1:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Simon Wise, (Thu Oct 25, 2:08 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Robin Gareus, (Thu Oct 25, 2:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Thu Oct 25, 3:38 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Oct 25, 1:44 am)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Gene Heskett, (Wed Oct 24, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, Paul Davis, (Wed Oct 24, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Fairlight, david, (Wed Oct 24, 7:09 pm)