Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <len@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, October 13, 2012 - 9:33 am

--Sig_/BOZIIEkSVCZmmoZmlg+Lbq6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:24:44 -0700
"Len Ovens" wrote:

> > I'm fine with using shell scripts to start a session. The only

If I recall correctly even Awesome can do it. Also you can set a
different "tiling schemes", or however that's called, on each workspace,
which is handy for handling different situations (one big-window apps
versus many small-window apps)

Some time ago I was using Awesome like this and it worked well... A
major turn off for me though was the fact that they explicitly state
that configuration might break between updates

--Sig_/BOZIIEkSVCZmmoZmlg+Lbq6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQeTYbAAoJEBz6xFdttjrf+HgIAId2AZ3XUvsCidHPwI3sFRw8
nOmkY7MUOg4IT1thAjXdjBVOHV5uxJ7qHi6aOKbwwmCEsy/WX/HGGV2KQrqt+zy2
W+gNrKZUkcU4lDKETT+hPLSGdS5cYGWxQG2WeblaUNaR31BvA5mwrqh93nOixULY
pzDkCrVwTG88d7cizaHxpB6k5K6VHA0W77dBkivdOO8YngptnSovY83H7HjuK6Sa
3FjVdqQlrI5ryo9RZWB63JVi5wrLPelwwtnODE4bZXW9TXNg1SSLXH8LxoGzImEp
nvMqUkb+J9sBtLbSohItiCziHwb4poaKhQkVrGt+HICdjmc/OllvRjJO6bXeeEs=
=O2s/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/BOZIIEkSVCZmmoZmlg+Lbq6--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 8:24 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, (Wed Oct 10, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 6:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, James Mckernon, (Wed Oct 10, 5:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Florian Paul Schmidt, (Thu Oct 11, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Lorenzo Sutton, (Wed Oct 10, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Clemens Ladisch, (Wed Oct 10, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, renato, (Sat Oct 13, 9:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Chris Bannister, (Sat Oct 20, 6:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 10:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 10:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:30 am)