Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 - 10:49 am

--20cf3071c6b266053204cbb235a2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Lorenzo!

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lorenzo Sutton
wrote:

>

t
pple
There are a few USB 2 interfaces that have been confirmed to work with
Linux/JACK such as the Presonus AudioBox 1818VSL if you need more than a
couple of inputs or the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 if you have lesser
requirements. There's more than just those 2 but thats just off the top of
my head and I've not personally tried either yet although I should receive
my Scarlett 2i4 soon.

--20cf3071c6b266053204cbb235a2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Lorenzo!On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:26=
AM, Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton@gmail.com> wrote:=

USB aiming at world domination, linux was probably the first OS to support =
USB 3.0 but... we still barely have a multichannel usb card which is USB 2.=
0 (or do we?)

Example: still to mention RME-land: they claim USB 2.0 "class complian=
ce" for the UCX, this is so that you can connect your =80 1,200 card &=
quot;to an Apple iPad or iPad2!" (sic - wtf?) of course "It won&#=
39;t be comparable to the RME drivers in terms of latency, though."

There are a few USB 2 interfaces that =
have been confirmed to work with Linux/JACK such as the=A0Presonus AudioBox=
1818VSL if you need more than a couple of inputs or the Focusrite Scarlett=
2i2 if you have lesser requirements. There's more than just those 2 bu=
t thats just off the top of my head and I've not personally tried eithe=
r yet although I should receive my Scarlett 2i4 soon.
=A0

--20cf3071c6b266053204cbb235a2--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 8:24 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, (Wed Oct 10, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 6:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, James Mckernon, (Wed Oct 10, 5:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Florian Paul Schmidt, (Thu Oct 11, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Lorenzo Sutton, (Wed Oct 10, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Clemens Ladisch, (Wed Oct 10, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Chris Bannister, (Sat Oct 20, 6:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 10:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 10:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:30 am)