Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>, Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 - 10:30 am

--20cf3078133aeed64004cbb1f0d2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Louigi!

There are very few plugins but thankfully the best GUI synths for Linux -
Noisemaker and Aspect - both run as plugins. Whysynth has its fans too, if
your host supports DSSI.

We have A3.0, bitwig and Muse VST support all coming up soon so my fingers
are tightly crossed this combo will gain us more users, devs and plugins.
bitwig will be the first time that 'big name' (being a descendant of
Ableton, kinda) audio app gets a native Linux port so its uncharted
territory for this community - lets hope for the best!

DM

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:

> Hey Dan!

--20cf3078133aeed64004cbb1f0d2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Louigi!There are very few plugins but thankfully the=
best GUI synths for Linux - Noisemaker and Aspect - both run as plugins. W=
hysynth has its fans too, if your host supports DSSI.
We have A3.0, bitwig and Muse VST support all coming up soon so my fin=
gers are tightly crossed this combo will gain us more users, devs and plugi=
ns. bitwig will be the first time that 'big name' (being a descenda=
nt of Ableton, kinda) audio app gets a native Linux port so its uncharted t=
erritory for this community - lets hope for the best!
DMOn Wed, Oct 10, 20=
12 at 11:13 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Dan!"Savi=
ng projects is only tricky if you use the modular approach versus=20
instrument plugins hence this isn't really a problem for A3 and=20
qtractor."True, but since there are very few plugins, mo=
st power of Linux Audio today is not in its plugin collection ;)

--20cf3078133aeed64004cbb1f0d2--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 8:24 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, (Wed Oct 10, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 6:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, James Mckernon, (Wed Oct 10, 5:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Florian Paul Schmidt, (Thu Oct 11, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Lorenzo Sutton, (Wed Oct 10, 10:26 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Clemens Ladisch, (Wed Oct 10, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Chris Bannister, (Sat Oct 20, 6:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Oct 10, 10:13 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, rosea.grammostola, (Wed Oct 10, 10:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?, Dan MacDonald, (Wed Oct 10, 10:30 am)