-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi. Thanks very much for your reply!
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:42:11 -0500
Joe Hartley wrote:
That's the difference between an active and a passive DI, right? A
passive DI just converts to a balanced signal, while an active DI also
boosts the level. Right?
> This can often be done in software,
Right. My problem is my home -- both the space I have to use to
record, and the circumstances (s.o., neighbor, etc.). I can't turn up
a guitar amp and record its output right now. An electric has to go
direct, with me listening by headphones -- there's just no avoiding it
right now. My acoustic/electrics I can probably mic.
But how can *preamplification* be handled in software like this? In
order to apply amplification on the digital signal, you have to have
already sampled the analog signal. Do you send the guitar signal into a
line-level input even though it's much weaker than line level?
I wasn't familiar with Guitarix; how does it compare to Rakarrack?
> Balanced vs. unbalanced (or TRS vs. TS) has nothing to do with line
The amplifier for my electrics has a preamp out and power in, intended
for effects. Can I use that preamp? Or should the guitar preamp I use
for recording be *after* changing to a balanced signal? I presume that
guitar and mic levels are sufficiently different that they don't use
the same type of preamp either, right?
> Hope this helps!
It all did, very much. Thanks!
Chris Metzler email@example.com
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since
I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Linux-audio-user mailing list