Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - 7:02 am

--f46d04446c57a2a5e104b62719ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2012/1/9 Moshe Werner

> Hi Raffaele,

in this case debian AMD64 would be your choice. I am actually running it on
a dell workstation with Intel Xeon CPU @ 2.50GHz
64bit releases are on debian official branch since debian etch (
http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/)

As someone pointed you don't need an RT kernel if DON'Tt want to record
16tr+monitoring+fx, 48Khz and 2.67ms latency :-)

Moreover, bear in mind that a lightweight desktop environment is what you
want for your system unless you have tons of ram and cpu cycles to spend :-)

So, whatever your choice will be, you should avoid fatter ones such kde or
gnome and try instead awesome, fluxbox, xfce.

regards
-r

--
*L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata
all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti, alla
protesta violenta e viscerale.*

--f46d04446c57a2a5e104b62719ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012/1/9 Moshe Werner <moshwe@gmail.com><=
/span>

Hi Raffaele,thanks for the reply!=A0My needs would be:Mainly tracking (by no=
w up to 8 channels at given time).Mixing and monitoring - Yep

Realtime fx - also yes.Tried AVlinux and fou=
nd it to be pretty cool, but its 32 bit and till now I'm used to 64 bit=
and wouldlike to keep using the more advanced PC technology. (Finally when=
Protools 11 takes the leap into 64bit technology it would be sad to see my=
Linux system going backwards).

in this case debian AMD64 would be your choice.=
I am actually running it on a dell workstation with Intel Xeon CPU @ 2.50G=
Hz64bit releases are on debian official branch since debian etch (http://www.debi=
an.org/ports/amd64/
)

As someone pointed you don't need an RT kernel if DON'Tt want t=
o record 16tr+monitoring+fx, 48Khz and 2.67ms latency :-)Moreover, =
bear in mind that a lightweight desktop environment is what you want for yo=
ur system unless you have tons of ram and cpu cycles to spend :-)
So, whatever your choice will be, you should avoid fatter ones such kde=
or gnome and try instead awesome, fluxbox, xfce.regard=
s-r-- L'unica spera=
nza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una,
resta affidata all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita
in progetti, alla protesta violenta e viscerale.

--f46d04446c57a2a5e104b62719ad--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 2:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Jan 11, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Jan 12, 8:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Fri Jan 13, 12:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Wed Jan 11, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Dave Phillips, (Wed Jan 11, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Jan 12, 8:11 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Thu Jan 12, 8:25 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Thu Jan 12, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Thu Jan 12, 6:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, michael noble, (Tue Jan 10, 12:47 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Ronald Stewart, (Tue Jan 10, 1:05 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Jan 9, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 9:02 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Paul Davis, (Tue Jan 10, 12:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, tee, (Thu Jan 12, 4:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Fri Jan 13, 4:59 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Fri Jan 13, 7:45 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Nicola Pandini, (Sat Jan 14, 10:38 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Feb 20, 7:38 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, david, (Fri Jan 13, 8:43 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, fred, (Tue Jan 10, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Wed Jan 11, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jan 11, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Brett McCoy, (Wed Jan 11, 1:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Diego Simak, (Tue Jan 10, 12:07 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 8:15 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, gene heskett, (Tue Jan 10, 2:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Jeremy Jongepier, (Tue Jan 10, 3:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Hartmut Noack, (Mon Jan 9, 5:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 5:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Hartmut Noack, (Mon Jan 9, 9:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Mon Jan 9, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Jan 10, 7:02 am)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jan 9, 4:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Joe Hartley, (Mon Jan 9, 3:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] OS for realtime operation, Moshe Werner, (Mon Jan 9, 4:24 pm)