linuxaudio.org

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen  wrote:

quoted text
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

>

>> hint: the patch to add a new port type to JACK will involve on the

>> same order of magnitude number of characters as have already been used

>> in this email thread.

>

> Indeed. But why should anyone submit a patch for an idea that

> has already been rejected, in particular if the rejection was

> motivated in a way that implicitly condones crappy programming

> instead of criticizing it ? What sort of excellence can you

> expect if things are decided in that way ? (1)

it wasn't rejected.
> Don't take this personally, but I've had enough of this sort

quoted text
> of negative argumentation for some time. I do remember the LV2

> discussions (2), the Jack session ones, and some others. And

> the result is that I go my own way, even if that leads to a

> loss of synergy and benefit for all.

fair enough.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user