linuxaudio.org

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:38:51PM +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

quoted text
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:42:05PM +0400, Artem Vakhitov wrote:

> > On 22.09.2011 23:16, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> >> If you need not only the timing but also to control volume

> >> then it's unlikely this can be done without delay. The part

> >> of the input that would contain usable information to control

> >> volume would very probably come after the trigger, but to

> >> play the sample you need both. The only solution then is to

> >> delay the trigger. That means that simple solutions such as

> >> the ladspa plugin can't do what you want.

> >

> > The thing is, I do not need to do that in any kind of real time. It

> > would be sufficient to feed a "beat box" .wav file at the input and get

> > the corresponding .wav or .mid file at the output. All digital

> > processing can be done fully off-line, so all timing and amplitude info

> > is there in advance.

>

> Even if it hasn't to work in real time Pd is probably the

> ideal tool to prototype such a system. The alternative

Just idle curiosity, but why do you guys recommend PD over SC or csound?

I had the idea they were more or less equally suited.

Cheers,

S.M.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user