Re: [LAU] OT: printers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, September 15, 2011 - 1:29 pm

--nextPart1872999.czbd27xLRk
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday 15 September 2011 14:43:14 fred wrote:

Laser is imho recommended both when you print much (>10 pages a day) and wh=
en=20
you print very little (~10 print-jobs a year).
The advantage of laser for high-volume doesn't need to be told, but for ver=
y=20
low volume a laser is at an advantage too: You can completely disconnect th=
e=20
printer when not using it. With an inkjet you have the choice of unplugging=
=20
the printer (and have the print-head dried out when you need to print that=
=20
urgent document due tomorrow morning), or leave it connected to the mains a=
nd=20
use power constantly to regularly keep the ink running a little. Needless t=
o=20
say that this consumes power and ink in times where you are not printing at=
=20
all. And one filling of laser-toner last longer than one filling of ink (ge=
neral=20
statement abstracted from any printer models).

So, if you have the choice and don't need to print colors that much, get a=
=20
laser to print your sheets, cd inlets or backup-tape-logs.

And to emphasize what fred says, the fastest and cheapest and greenest=20
printing job is not printing at all.

Have fun,

Arnold

--nextPart1872999.czbd27xLRk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk5x/Z4ACgkQuYLL1cDjHx0VawCbBCfKlqGxgX/07bsq5BUs1MC/
/ZcAnRukh63lwFOfS7szlUOKpMZDTbmT
=jHt1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1872999.czbd27xLRk--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OT: printers, Ken Restivo, (Thu Sep 15, 1:35 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, david, (Thu Sep 15, 10:06 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, David Stephens, (Thu Sep 15, 3:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Dave Phillips, (Thu Sep 15, 9:18 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, immanuel litzroth, (Thu Sep 15, 9:29 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Stephen Stubbs, (Thu Sep 15, 2:29 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Rob, (Thu Sep 15, 2:13 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, david, (Thu Sep 15, 10:10 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, fred, (Thu Sep 15, 12:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Arnold Krille, (Thu Sep 15, 1:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Philipp Überbacher, (Mon Sep 19, 5:51 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, david, (Mon Sep 19, 8:40 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Monty Montgomery, (Mon Sep 19, 10:14 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, fred, (Thu Sep 15, 2:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, , (Thu Sep 15, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Dave Phillips, (Thu Sep 15, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, immanuel litzroth, (Thu Sep 15, 10:25 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, david, (Thu Sep 15, 7:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Luke Peterson, (Thu Sep 15, 1:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, sevol, (Fri Sep 16, 3:03 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, James Morris, (Fri Sep 16, 12:26 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, James Morris, (Fri Sep 16, 12:30 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Ken Restivo, (Thu Sep 15, 5:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, sevol, (Sat Sep 17, 10:05 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Ken Restivo, (Mon Sep 19, 6:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Atte André Jensen, (Thu Sep 15, 4:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Ken Restivo, (Thu Sep 15, 4:09 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Kevin Cosgrove, (Thu Sep 15, 1:56 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, plutek, (Thu Sep 15, 1:54 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, tee, (Mon Sep 19, 4:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: printers, Bob van der Poel, (Thu Sep 15, 1:46 am)