Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - 11:04 pm

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:48:39 +0200
Dominic Sacré wrote:

> I have a medium-sized Ardour session with a couple of plugins on most

Bounce a temporary mix of your already recorded tracks and temporarily
inactivate those tracks (Track menu or right-click menu on the strip) to
make room for the new ones. Use the bounce as the only track playing and
active while you record the rest. Maybe this will save enough
horsepower so that your system deals with the load. At mix time, relax
the latency constraint and reactivate all the tracks.

HTH, have fun.

-- David
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, Dominic , (Wed Sep 14, 10:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 14, 11:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, Dominic , (Fri Sep 16, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, Paul Davis, (Sat Sep 17, 2:47 am)
Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, David, (Wed Sep 14, 11:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] JACK clients at different period sizes, Dominic , (Fri Sep 16, 10:56 pm)