Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack recording?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack recording?

Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - 8:46 am

Paul Davis wrote:

quoted text

> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the hints. I'll try to fiddle some more with audacity,
>
> as several people have noted, it would be much better to fiddle more
> with arecord first.

Maybe. My UCA-202 records fine using Audacity. I couldn't get arecord to
record anything from it, but I wasn't really trying that hard. When I
try to record using JACK, JACK fails to start up, reporting something
about an impossible sample size.

My feeling based on the original poster's info is that his device is
only marginally supported by ALSA.

--
David
gnome@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack recording?, Arve Barsnes, (Mon Sep 12, 6:01 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Ken Restivo, (Wed Sep 14, 6:25 pm)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Robin Gareus, (Mon Sep 12, 7:42 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Paul Davis, (Mon Sep 12, 10:28 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Robin Gareus, (Mon Sep 12, 10:58 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., allcoms, (Mon Sep 12, 11:08 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Arve Barsnes, (Mon Sep 12, 11:12 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Paul Davis, (Mon Sep 12, 11:14 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., david, (Tue Sep 13, 8:46 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Arve Barsnes, (Tue Sep 13, 10:29 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., david, (Wed Sep 14, 8:27 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Arve Barsnes, (Mon Sep 12, 11:26 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Arve Barsnes, (Mon Sep 12, 3:58 pm)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Robin Gareus, (Mon Sep 12, 9:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Arve Barsnes, (Mon Sep 12, 10:02 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Joel Roth, (Mon Sep 12, 7:42 am)

Re: [LAU] Alternative to audacity for simple non-jack record..., Cedric Roux, (Mon Sep 12, 7:40 am)