Re: [LAU] A good Sampler

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dale Powell <dj_kaza@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, September 11, 2011 - 1:46 pm

--20cf30025e9091260804acaaa442
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes

I've had this coded up before, the problem is that if you want to "pitch
shift" each sample individually it really does become pretty heavy on the
CPU. Unless your not *dynamically* changing the value of the pitch shift,
in which case it can be rendered to a buffer & just played back.

I would share the source if it was in better condition, most of it is hacks
on hacks for extra random features... but I can zip it & ship it to
somebody if they'd care to take a look. A JACK client wrapper would need to
be coded up, its only the "sampler / pitch shifter" now.

> Best free library from timestretch I know of is the RubberBand one.
There is also SoundTouch, its LGPL even more relaxed than the GPL of
RubberBand. Its what I used for the project mentioned above.

Cheers, -Harry

--20cf30025e9091260804acaaa442
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've had this coded up before, the problem is that if you want to &quot=
;pitch shift" each sample individually it really does become pretty he=
avy on the CPU. Unless your not *dynamically* changing the value of the pit=
ch shift, in which case it can be rendered to a buffer & just played back.<=
br />I would share the source if it was in better condition, most of =
it is hacks on hacks for extra random features... but I can zip it & ship i=
t to somebody if they'd care to take a look. A JACK client wrapper woul=
d need to be coded up, its only the "sampler / pitch shifter" now=
. > Best free library from timestretch I know of is the Rubb=
erBand one.There is also SoundTouch, its LGPL even more relaxed than =
the GPL of RubberBand. Its what I used for the project mentioned above.Cheers, -Harry
--20cf30025e9091260804acaaa442--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] A good Sampler, Jordan Wade, (Sun Sep 11, 12:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Sep 12, 7:33 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Renato, (Mon Sep 12, 10:27 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Sep 12, 10:38 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Jeremy Jongepier, (Mon Sep 12, 10:43 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Renato, (Mon Sep 12, 2:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, fred, (Sun Sep 11, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Lorenzo Sutton, (Sun Sep 11, 1:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Dale Powell, (Sun Sep 11, 1:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, David Cornette, (Tue Sep 13, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Dale Powell, (Tue Sep 13, 11:18 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Lorenzo Sutton, (Mon Sep 12, 7:27 am)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, , (Sun Sep 11, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Goran Mekić, (Sun Sep 11, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Jordan Wade, (Sun Sep 11, 12:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] A good Sampler, Philipp Überbacher, (Sun Sep 11, 4:02 pm)