Re: [LAU] Reply to

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 - 7:50 pm

On 09/08/2011, Thorsten Wilms wrote:

They may be broken, but they are probably also popular - Gmail, for
example. Sorry, but I'm not going to change my mail client for one
list, and I doubt many people are; and when it's a list like this one,
which is targeted at end users who may not care very much about
anything but getting music made, dogmatism on this point is a
user-hostile position.

Not that I necessarily disagree with the choice. If you want to reply
to list, reply-to-all does it, and that's available on just about any
mail client anywhere; whereas if reply-to-list were the default, you
need to cut & paste the individual's name. It's the use of an
ideological position to defend the choice, when there is a rational
non-dogmatic argument easily available, that pisses me off.

(What I'd prefer to see is the option on the user page, so that those
who want to reply to list by default can tick the checkbox and do so,
and those of us who have got used to hitting reply-to-all or have
clients with reply-to-list functionality can carry on as before.)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Reply to, Goran Mekic, (Tue Aug 9, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Thorsten Wilms, (Tue Aug 9, 1:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, S. Massy, (Wed Aug 10, 3:18 am)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, david, (Wed Aug 10, 6:45 am)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Gwenhwyfaer, (Tue Aug 9, 7:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, david, (Wed Aug 10, 6:40 am)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Thorsten Wilms, (Tue Aug 9, 8:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Gwenhwyfaer, (Wed Aug 10, 6:29 am)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Thorsten Wilms, (Wed Aug 10, 6:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Joe Hartley, (Tue Aug 9, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Reply to, Julien Claassen, (Tue Aug 9, 1:21 pm)