linuxaudio.org

On 08/10/2011 08:29 AM, Gwenhwyfaer wrote:
>> Reply-to-all gets the original senders address from where?

quoted text
>

> Same place as reply-to gets it, I should imagine. (I can't shake the

> feeling that you didn't think this question through.)

I meant in the case reply-to-munging happens, but oh please forgive me

for asking a question without thinking about it all that long.
>> Oh, and receiving mail with both a list and my address in recipients as

quoted text
>> result of a reply-to-all sucks, as it screws up filtering.

>

> Oh. So my broken client is a problem that mustn't be worked around in

> order to force a change, but your broken client is something that must

> always be catered for by everyone else? There's a word for that kind

> of thinking.

If there are no list fields left in the header as is the case in your

email I'm replying to, a filter that works with any of those fields

can't work. Not a broken client, but broken processing beforehand.
> On the other hand, perhaps I shouldn't expect logic from someone who

quoted text
> attacks the one bit of a critical email which is basically in

> agreement with them...

You are needlessly aggressive and are getting personal.
--

Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:

http://thorwil.wordpress.com/

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user