linuxaudio.org

On 09/08/2011, Thorsten Wilms  wrote:

quoted text
> On 08/09/2011 09:50 PM, Gwenhwyfaer wrote:

>> If you want to reply

>> to list, reply-to-all does it,

>

> Reply-to-all gets the original senders address from where?

Same place as reply-to gets it, I should imagine. (I can't shake the

feeling that you didn't think this question through.)
> Oh, and receiving mail with both a list and my address in recipients as

quoted text
> result of a reply-to-all sucks, as it screws up filtering.

Oh. So my broken client is a problem that mustn't be worked around in

order to force a change, but your broken client is something that must

always be catered for by everyone else? There's a word for that kind

of thinking.
On the other hand, perhaps I shouldn't expect logic from someone who

attacks the one bit of a critical email which is basically in

agreement with them...

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user