Re: [LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Baron <d_baron@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011 - 3:39 pm

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Baron wrote:

>> Does anyone uses oomidi 2 and / or can tell us what to expect really

Windows has more than just two -- you forgot about Pro-Tools, Nuendo,
Reason, FLStudio, Reaper, Ableton Live...

I believe OOM2 is based on Muse (which has a 2.0 version in beta,
BTW), whereas OOM1 was based on Rosegarden with the notation stuff
stripped out and a couple of other tweaks. I'd tried using OOM1 and
liked it quite a bit but it was terribly unstable so I abandoned it
(and it wouldn't build on anything except Gentoo).

--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
    -- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable, rosea grammostola, (Thu Jun 23, 3:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable, Goran Mekić, (Thu Jun 23, 4:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable, David Baron, (Thu Jun 23, 3:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable, Brett McCoy, (Thu Jun 23, 3:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] OpenOctaveMIDI 2 stable, S C Rigler, (Thu Jun 23, 3:16 pm)