linuxaudio.org

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Baron  wrote:
>> Does anyone uses oomidi 2 and / or can tell us what to expect really

quoted text
>

>> when it comes to an stable release or not and if yes, when?

>

> Gitting it right now! Looks quite exciting.

>

> My last windows software was Home Studio, Sonar's little cousin with much

> more bang for the buck. The Win98 version dispensed with the console

> view--no big loss since a mouse is no engineer's 10 fingers. When i-Pad

> screens can be used for such programs, this will change. OOM has drawn

> automation like Home Studio as well as a console view. Looking forward to

> giving this a try.

>

> Let's get this straight, windows has two big programs, Sonar and Cubase and

> some smaller opensource and other competition. Count the linux choices!

Windows has more than just two -- you forgot about Pro-Tools, Nuendo,

Reason, FLStudio, Reaper, Ableton Live...
I believe OOM2 is based on Muse (which has a 2.0 version in beta,

BTW), whereas OOM1 was based on Rosegarden with the notation stuff

stripped out and a couple of other tweaks. I'd tried using OOM1 and

liked it quite a bit but it was terribly unstable so I abandoned it

(and it wouldn't build on anything except Gentoo).
--

Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,

it would overturn the world."

    -- Jelaleddin Rumi

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user