Re: [LAU] 2.6.39.1 threadirqs vs. the rest: some numbers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, June 18, 2011 - 5:56 pm

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:38:11PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

still... it provides some numbers.
and what i get seems to differ from what you get pretty heavily.

---( torbenh@siel )---( ~/cvs/rt-tests )---
-> uname -a
Linux siel 2.6.39 #53 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 25 22:11:00 CEST 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux
---( torbenh@siel )---( ~/cvs/rt-tests )---
-> ./cyclictest -t1 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 -m
policy: fifo: loadavg: 2.34 1.27 0.54 5/267 10411

T: 0 ( 7904) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 8 Act: 19 Avg: 17 Max:
97
---( torbenh@siel )---( ~/cvs/rt-tests )---

its just a single run. with a kernel compile in the background.
and thats WITHOUT threadirqs

> See below for details... (look at the "Avg:" and "Max:" latency

you did not use -m ... although that didnt really change much for me.
but i have plenty of RAM here.

>

hmm... maybe i should have loaded up ff...
but i loaded midori. because ff was already running.

>

--
torben Hohn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] 2.6.39.1 threadirqs vs. the rest: some numbers, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Tue Jun 14, 12:38 am)
Re: [LAU] 2.6.39.1 threadirqs vs. the rest: some numbers, torbenh, (Sat Jun 18, 5:56 pm)
[LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Sat Jun 18, 8:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sun Jun 19, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Sun Jun 19, 8:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Mon Jun 20, 1:46 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Tue Jun 21, 2:30 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Jun 21, 3:14 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Tue Jun 21, 3:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Jun 21, 3:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Thu Jun 23, 2:28 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Mon Jun 20, 12:30 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Fri Jun 24, 5:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Dragan Noveski, (Sun Jun 19, 4:08 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Mon Jun 20, 8:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Dragan Noveski, (Wed Jun 22, 11:58 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Conrad , (Sun Jul 10, 9:40 am)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Tue Jul 12, 2:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Conrad , (Tue Jul 12, 4:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Mon Jul 18, 3:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Conrad , (Mon Jul 18, 7:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] GMorgan_0.40, Robert Vogel, (Sun Jun 19, 3:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] 2.6.39.1 threadirqs vs. the rest: some numbers, MK aka El Doctor, (Fri Jun 17, 11:50 pm)