Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-devel@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 - 6:46 am

> To me that suggests that either you have a completely unique

Certainly not unique. My guess is that nobody worried about a
(possibly small) performance penalty, and instead used simpler
strategies. Or they gave up libsndfile, or they never used libsndfile
in the first place (e.g. due to the scaling factors issue).

> Modifying libsndfile to do fread/fwrite style buffering would be

Given the virtual I/O layer in libsndfile, this is superfluous (and,
furthermore, a userspace cache adds an extra layer of copying, which
in *other* use cases could reduce performance).

> Was that a confirmation or a request for confirmation? Joining a

I know. Maybe I messed something up -- I don't have copies anymore.
However if that were the case the message I sent two weeks ago should
have bounced back too.

The main problem that I see though is the lack of a mailing list
archive. So let's continue on LAD.

-- Dan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Dan Muresan, (Mon Jun 13, 11:43 am)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Dan Muresan, (Mon Jun 13, 9:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Tue Jun 14, 12:12 am)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Dan Muresan, (Tue Jun 14, 6:46 am)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Paul Davis, (Tue Jun 14, 12:17 am)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Dan Muresan, (Tue Jun 14, 6:29 am)
Re: [LAU] cancelling I/O with libsndfile, Erik de Castro Lopo, (Mon Jun 13, 11:56 am)