Re: [LAU] Pipe not working - or is it lame or oggdec

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Davis <paul@...>
Cc: <Linux-audio-user@...>, Daniel Worth <pipemanmusic@...>
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011 - 1:50 pm

On 05/05/11 21:16, Paul Davis wrote:

Which, if valid, simply exposes the absurd charade that underlies this all -
above 'solution' would mean no company which has a suitable employee earning
under $100,000 who could be put on a contract instead need ever abide by the
license conditions, just put whoever could actually click the encode button on a
contract for their normal duties, including explicitly the mp3 delivery, then do
whatever you want with the resulting mp3s and ignore the rest of the license.

But maybe a closer look at the license would reveal that this does not get you
out of it. Otherwise a lot of money has been wasted on the lawyers who drew up
the almost useless document.

Simon
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Pipe not working - or is it lame or oggdec, Simon Wise, (Thu May 5, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Pipe not working - or is it lame or oggdec, Simon Wise, (Thu May 5, 1:50 pm)